Twinks 60's and 70's

#31 » Post by **Exor** » 04 Mar 2015 14:51

stop blocking queue/queuing as horde and afking...

#32 » Post by **Galactrial** » 04 Mar 2015 18:22

Some horde twinks join instantly if they know that they will outnumber alliance twinks. But when it's even half of them won't even que. Everyone should know who i'm talking about.

#33 » Post by **Dropdead** » 04 Mar 2015 18:30

U speak about even ? When its even you lose hard usually , as rare as I log my twink , thats the outcome most of the time , ofcourse that doesnt stop you from calling 5 more twinks + 2 healers just to win vs 3-4 horde ones , yeah you all are very brave then : DD I can mention atleast 5 ally twinks that never join without their pockets . If you think that makes you guys good , okay . That's also main reason why im so inactive in that bracket and only log when ppl say they are outnumbered and need twinks . Get your facts straight before talking crap .

#34 » Post by **shaun03** » 04 Mar 2015 18:41

Name those players please. Please.

#35 » Post by **Dropdead** » 04 Mar 2015 18:48

This might turn into flaming topic , which i have no intent to but if you really want sure ill mention some of them . Sentaku , Tariona , Remo , Chelia , Agape , Kagasawa , Ragemode . Especially the first two , you can never see in a bg without their pockets . All mentioned go in pairs by two usually , still this is a known fact by everyone and I dont bitch about it , I'm whatever with it but when ppl like Galactrical start speakning nonsence I though I'll bring it up just as an reminder .

#36 » Post by **Galactrial** » 04 Mar 2015 18:53

Just gonna look up on PvP stats.
http://www.truewow.org/pvpstats/battleg ... p?id=14570
For example. You were there and you should know who are the twinks.

#37 » Post by **shaun03** » 04 Mar 2015 18:56

Sentaku = Ojisan, Ragemode = Holyteats. They alternate their horde characters to which side is struggling with twinks. And who would you consider their "pockets"? Remo was horde. When we complained about him, it was fine with you as long as you were winning?

I'm going to leave this record with you from the other night :

If I'm not mistaken, twinks on either side are even - here.

We still came from behind, Alliance 300 - Horde 500, to beat you. On top of that, I was playing shockadin spec, so I guess I'm an idiot nab! ;D and cannot be considered dps / heals.

#38 » Post by **Exor** » 04 Mar 2015 18:57

Galactrial wrote:Just gonna look up on PvP stats.
http://www.truewow.org/pvpstats/battleg ... p?id=14570
For example. You were there and you should know who are the twinks.

half the twinks you started that bg with left anyway....

#39 » Post by **Galactrial** » 04 Mar 2015 19:05

Exor wrote:half the twinks you started that bg with left anyway....

Please tell me who left. They are going on ignore instantly.

If it was the other way around, WSG would have ended within 5 minutes. I saw it too many times happen.
Cheers for those that sticked around even if they got farmed.

#40 » Post by **Dropdead** » 04 Mar 2015 19:07

I dont count these players as horde , simply cuz i never played with them , they are always on alliance . I dont see why you guys would link me bgs too , what are you trying to prove with those ? Aside from you not counting right twinks i see nothing else , braggin? Bringing up logs is easiest thing i can do too but its pointless . I told myself i wont post anymore in twink topics after a while back but yea , knew writing here was a mistake . I have no intention on aswering on anymore here as its pointless , just try to keep all on topic and offtopic to a minimum , if you guys dont want it closed like last one . Peace .

#41 » Post by **Exor** » 04 Mar 2015 19:14

Galactrial wrote:
Exor wrote:half the twinks you started that bg with left anyway....
Please tell me who left. They are going on ignore instantly.

If it was the other way around, WSG would have ended within 5 minutes. I saw it too many times happen.
Cheers for those that sticked around even if they got farmed.

sentaku and ragemode joined after the others left...i cant remember who it was...

#42 » Post by **shaun03** » 04 Mar 2015 19:14

It's on topic. We're discussing the bgs. Just because you're a sore loser doesn't mean you have to behave like you are.

#43 » Post by **Dropdead** » 04 Mar 2015 19:24

Still proveking me I see , but its whatever , not like I care what fail 80s and ppl that think of themselfs for good twinks in a bullshit bracket think about me anyway .

#44 » Post by **ShinDarth** » 04 Mar 2015 19:28

That was fun

http://www.truewow.org/pvpstats/battleg ... p?id=14667

it was long time I didn't played with Ronaldo

#45 » Post by **shaun03** » 04 Mar 2015 19:29

Twinking isn't that bad, otherwise you wouldn't be doing it. Go back to your so pro 80 if you don't like teh bantz

Existing user Log In

Twinks 60's and 70's

Re: Twinks 60's and 70's

Re: Twinks 60's and 70's

Re: Twinks 60's and 70's

Re: Twinks 60's and 70's

Re: Twinks 60's and 70's

Re: Twinks 60's and 70's

Re: Twinks 60's and 70's

Re: Twinks 60's and 70's

Re: Twinks 60's and 70's

Re: Twinks 60's and 70's

Re: Twinks 60's and 70's

Re: Twinks 60's and 70's

Re: Twinks 60's and 70's

Re: Twinks 60's and 70's

Re: Twinks 60's and 70's

Who is online

Existing user Log In

Not a member? Register an account and join the adventure!

Who is online